<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Encyclopedia Britannica available to bloggers &#8211; for free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinygrass.com/2008/04/encyclopedia-britannica-available-to-bloggers-for-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinygrass.com/2008/04/encyclopedia-britannica-available-to-bloggers-for-free/</link>
	<description>Simple living, natural learning &#38; exploring the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arp</title>
		<link>http://www.tinygrass.com/2008/04/encyclopedia-britannica-available-to-bloggers-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-7112</link>
		<dc:creator>Arp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinygrass.com/?p=511#comment-7112</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s inevitable in a collective, public effort that everything won&#039;t be perfect.  That&#039;s just the nature of humanity.  If EB establishes a wiki in the future, the possibility of errors will certainly be introduced.  But I agree that both have a place.  I don&#039;t see myself eschewing Wikipedia in favor of EB - in all likelihood, Wikipedia is probably easier to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s inevitable in a collective, public effort that everything won&#8217;t be perfect.  That&#8217;s just the nature of humanity.  If EB establishes a wiki in the future, the possibility of errors will certainly be introduced.  But I agree that both have a place.  I don&#8217;t see myself eschewing Wikipedia in favor of EB &#8211; in all likelihood, Wikipedia is probably easier to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Upegui R.</title>
		<link>http://www.tinygrass.com/2008/04/encyclopedia-britannica-available-to-bloggers-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-7110</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Upegui R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinygrass.com/?p=511#comment-7110</guid>
		<description>&quot; love this - I’ve liked Wikipedia for the convenience, but always knew that there was a possibility of opinion or misinformation. &quot;

I&#039;ve been using Wikipedia for as long as I can remember, and can&#039;t recall an incident where I got inaccurate information.  It is the most updated source of information anywhere.

Britannica is also a highly-reputable reference source.  Both have a life in the information ecology.

&lt;em&gt;Omar Upegui R.&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://epiac1216.livejournal.com/256609.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Encyclopedia Britannica Steps Into the Spotlight&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; love this &#8211; I’ve liked Wikipedia for the convenience, but always knew that there was a possibility of opinion or misinformation. &#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using Wikipedia for as long as I can remember, and can&#8217;t recall an incident where I got inaccurate information.  It is the most updated source of information anywhere.</p>
<p>Britannica is also a highly-reputable reference source.  Both have a life in the information ecology.</p>
<p><em>Omar Upegui R.&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://epiac1216.livejournal.com/256609.html' rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/epiac1216.livejournal.com/256609.html?referer=');">Encyclopedia Britannica Steps Into the Spotlight</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
